|
This was
excellent. Good pacing, good balance of lecture and
activity. Very well organized and interesting.
Joel's experience and
examples in actual therapy cases that reinforced what he taught
us. The powerpoint/video presentation was an excellent
teaching tool. His open mind and humor!
I liked that after
the description of the tool, we had a chance to see how they are being
applied in practice through video clips.
You really answered
each question asked of you and helped me better understand this
approach.
The idea of focusing
on solutions rather than problem solving - totally different from what
I've been taught.
Great! I'm
very interested in learning more.
I enjoyed the
exercises because they were well designed to
show how the brief therapy approach is quite different; but effective.
I enjoyed this and
found it helpful - I am looking forward to
trying it with my students. Thank you
I found that Joel's
style as a trainer is very
helpful.
You are very skilled
and enthusiastic and I appreciate you
sharing both with me. You helped to clarify quite a few
things for me.
I enjoyed it
all. I wish I could do it. I want to
learn more.
I found the
questions, feedback and spontaneous role play
where groups worked together with a client to ask questions with input
from Joel
very useful. Great job! I really enjoyed and learned from
this training.
I found this training
very informative especially with hands
on practice and videos to see it working in real situations.
I feel like I have a
good, strong sense of SFBT and have the
basic tools to implement them. That's a lot to learn in a
training.
Thank you.
Live sessions and
discussions of process were the best!
Learning the new language.
This training made me
think about how I can implement this
style of therapy into my position as a clinician. I'm already
thinking
about what changes I want to make when I return to work. Excellent presenter!! I received a wealth of knowledge! Wonderful program. I really appreciated the videos and discussion. Great interaction, variety of formats and experiences. Interesting and helpful tools and approach/questions etc.
Following are the results of a
recent training evaluation where participants were asked to
rate various elements on a range of totally disagree,
disagree, neutral,
agee, totally agree:
|
Totally
Disagree |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Totally
Agree |
| The presentation met my
expectation |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
90% |
| Joel was well prepared |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
100% |
| The workshop held my
attention |
0% |
0% |
0% |
20% |
80% |
| The material was
presented in an organized manner |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
90% |
| The material was clear
and easily understood |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
90% |
| The material is
potentially useful to what I do. |
0% |
0% |
0% |
20% |
80% |
| I would recommend this
workshop to others. |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
90% |
In 2009, I presented 5 times
for PESI in the Philadelphia, PA and Minneapolis, MN areas.
Following is the average of all 5 ratings.
1 = poor, 2 = below average, 3 = average, 4 = above average, 5 = Excellent
| Program | 4.58 | | Speaker | 4.64 | | Delivery | 4.60 | | Knowledge | 4.82 |
Top
For
further information contact
Joel
|